Proof of Concept (PoC)
BDA Genesis is best evaluated in a constrained pilot with explicit scope and measurable governance outcomes.
Goal
Determine whether diagnostic inference paths can be made explicit, reviewable and audit-ready — without replacing expert judgement.
Recommended PoC scope
- 2–3 recurring claim archetypes
- a small, representative sample of case files per archetype
- defined reviewers (claims/engineering/underwriting/legal as applicable)
Inputs (typical)
- case file documents (reports, emails, remediation proposals)
- photo documentation
- available measurements (where present)
- basic case metadata (jurisdiction, loss type, timeline)
Outputs (deliverables)
- Trace Pack (per case): structured inference path, assumptions, tests, uncertainties, decision-relevant signals
- Governance Summary (portfolio view): consistency gaps, variance drivers, review hotspots
- Measurement Report: agreed KPIs, baseline vs PoC period, interpretation notes
Measurement plan (examples)
- cycle time in selected archetypes
- re-open / clarification frequency
- documentation completeness for audit/review
- escalation frequency and rationale traceability
Boundary
BDA Genesis does not automate decisions and does not replace expert judgement.
The PoC is designed to make reasoning auditable — not to transfer accountability.