A deterministic framework for diagnostic reasoning and governance
BDA Genesis is a deterministic, audit-ready framework for transparent diagnostic inference across insurance, reinsurance and academic contexts.
It is designed for contexts where not only outcomes matter, but whether reasoning paths, assumptions and uncertainties can be independently reconstructed and reviewed. BDA Genesis operates between technical assessment and decision-making without automating decisions or replacing expert judgement.
Case Studies
BDA Genesis is designed for diagnostic ambiguity — where the outcome matters less than whether the reasoning path is reconstructable.
Example archetypes
- Moisture vs. escape of water: when cause classification drives coverage, scope and recourse
- Condensation and thermal bridges: when physics, usage and remediation proposals conflict
Technical and governance snapshot
- Deterministic structure: explicit steps, assumptions and inference paths
- Auditability: traceable reasoning, review-ready documentation
- Human-in-the-loop by design: no automated coverage or liability decisions
- No automated evaluations, recommendations, prioritizations or decisions
- Integration readiness: structured inputs/outputs and governance artifacts for internal review
Contact
For context-specific discussions, please reach out.
Email: Show email